Перевод: со всех языков на все языки

со всех языков на все языки

nor indeed is it necessary

  • 1 re fert

    rēfert (or separately rē fert), tŭlit, ferre, v. n. and impers. (plur. rarely personal; v. II. infra) [res - fero; the ancients regarded rē in this word as derived from res; cf. Fest. s. v. refert, p. 282 Müll.]; prop., it follows from or in view of a thing, i. q. ex re est; hence, it is for one ' s interest or advantage, it profits; or, in gen., it befits, matters, imports, concerns, it is of importance or consequence (syn.: juvat, conducit, attinet; freq. and class.); constr.,
    I.
    In all periods and in all kinds of composition, refert hoc ( id, illud, etc., a subj.-clause) meā ( tuā, etc., qs. fert re meā, tuā, etc.; cf. Prisc. p. 1077 P.) magni ( pluris, quanti, etc., nihil, quid?), or absol.
    (α).
    Hoc meā refert, etc. (in Cic. very rare;

    whereas interest meā occurs very freq.): tua istuc refert maxime,

    Plaut. Trin. 2, 2, 38:

    tua istuc refert, si curaveris,

    id. Am. 2, 2, 109:

    id mea minime refert,

    Ter. Ad. 5, 4, 27:

    quod refert tua,

    Plaut. Pers. 4, 3, 50:

    nihilo pol pluris tua hoc, quam quanti illud refert meā,

    id. Rud. 4, 3, 27:

    meā quidem istuc nihil refert,

    id. Pers. 4, 3, 68:

    id tuā refert nihil, utrum illae fecerint,

    Ter. Hec. 4, 3, 12:

    tuā quod nihil refert, ne Cures,

    Plaut. Stich. 2, 1, 48:

    tuā quod nihil refert, percontari desinas,

    Ter. Hec. 5, 3, 12:

    non ascripsi id, quod tuā nihil referebat,

    Cic. Fam. 5, 20, 5:

    quid id meā refert?

    Plaut. Curc. 3, 25; 4, 2, 44; id. Merc. 2, 3, 117:

    quid id refert tuā?

    id. Curc. 3, 88; id. Rud. 1, 2, 88; Ter. Phorm. 4, 5, 11.—With subj.-clause:

    quid meā refert, hae Athenis natae an Thebis sient?

    Plaut. Rud. 3, 4, 41.—
    (β).
    Hoc refert, etc.:

    quomodo habeas, illud refert, jurene an injuriā,

    Plaut. Rud. 4, 4, 25:

    ne illud quidem refert, consul an dictator an praetor spoponderit,

    Liv. 9, 9:

    illud permagni referre arbitror, Ut ne scientem sentiat te id sibi dare,

    Ter. Heaut. 3, 1, 58:

    primum illud parvi refert, nos publicanis amissis vectigalia postea victoria reciperare,

    Cic. Imp. Pomp. 7, 18:

    magni quod refert,

    Lucr. 2, 760:

    at quibus servis? refert enim magno opere id ipsum,

    Cic. Cael. 23, 57: quanti id refert? Vatin. ap. Cic. Fam. 5, 9, 1. — With subject-clause:

    parvi retulit Non suscepisse,

    Ter. Phorm. 4, 3, 41; cf.:

    parvi refert abs te ipso jus dici aequabiliter, nisi, etc.,

    Cic. Q. Fr. 1, 1, 7:

    quanti refert, te nec recte dicere, qui nihili faciat?

    Plaut. Ps. 4, 6, 23:

    meminero, sed quid meminisse id refert?

    id. Mil. 3, 1, 214:

    quid mihi refert Chrysalo esse nomen, nisi, etc.,

    id. Bacch. 4, 4, 53:

    quid te igitur rettulit Beneficum esse oratione, si, etc.,

    id. Ep. 1, 2, 13:

    neque refert videre, quid dicendum sit, nisi, etc.,

    Cic. Brut. 29, 110:

    neque enim numero comprehendere refert,

    nor indeed is it necessary, need we, Verg. G. 2, 104: nec dicaris aliquid, quod referret scire, reticuisse, Cael. ap. Cic. Fam. 8, 10, 2.—With [p. 1546] inf. pass.:

    jam nec mutari pabula refert,

    Verg. G. 3, 548; cf.:

    plures e familiā cognosci referre arbitror,

    Suet. Ner. 1. — With a rel. subj.-clause (so most freq. in the class. per.):

    ipsi animi magni refert quali in corpore locati sint,

    Cic. Tusc. 1, 33, 80: magni refert, hic quid velit, Caes. ap. Cic. Att. 14, 1, 2:

    cum ego ista omnia bona dixero, tantum refert, quam magna dicam,

    Cic. Fin. 5, 30, 90:

    quasi vero referat quam id saepe fiat,

    id. Div. 2, 29, 62:

    quid refert, quā me ratione cogatis?

    id. Lael. 8, 26:

    quid refert, utrum voluerim fieri, an gaudeam factum?

    id. Phil. 2, 12, 29:

    quid refert, tanto post ad judices deferantur, an omnino non deferantur?

    id. Fl. 9, 21:

    quae (aves) pascantur nec ne, quid refert?

    id. Div. 2, 34, 72:

    tuo vitio rerumne labores, Nil referre putas?

    Hor. S. 1, 2, 77:

    cum referre negas, quali sit quisque parente Natus,

    id. ib. 1, 6, 7 et saep.:

    quod tu istis lacrimis te probare postulas, Non pluris refert, quam si imbrem in cribrum geras,

    Plaut. Ps. 1, 1, 100; cf.:

    tantum retulerit, ut in transferendis seminibus similem statum caeli locique observemus,

    Col. 3, 9, 7. —
    (γ).
    Refert, etc.: Do. Hae (tabellae) quid ad me? To. Immo ad te attinent, Et tuā refert, Plaut. Pers. 4, 3, 28: Ep. Tua pol refert enim? Ge. Si quidem meā refert, operā utere, id. Stich. 4, 2, 36:

    quid tuā refert, qui cum istac venerit?

    id. Merc. 5, 2, 65:

    non plus suā referre, quam si, etc.,

    Cic. Quint. 5, 19:

    quos, cum nihil refert, pudet,

    Plaut. Ep. 2, 1, 1:

    cum nihilo pluris referet, quam si, etc.,

    id. Bacch. 3, 4, 20:

    nego et negando si quid refert, ravio,

    id. Poen. 3, 5, 33:

    si servus est, numquid refert?

    id. Ps. 2, 4, 28:

    quid refert, si hoc ipsum salsum illi et venustum videbatur?

    Cic. N. D. 1, 28, 79 et saep. —
    * (δ).
    Entirely absol.:

    bona Sejani ablata aerario, ut in fiscum cogerentur, tamquam referret,

    as though it mattered, as if there were any difference, Tac. A. 6, 2.—
    II.
    Analogous to attinet, conducit, and interest; it is of importance; it belongs, relates, concerns, etc.; constr., refert hoc, id, etc. (once referunt haec), ad aliquem, alicui, alicujus, etc. (mostly ante-class. and post-Aug.; but, with alicujus, once in Sall. and once in Liv.): quam ad rem istuc refert? Plaut Ep. 2, 2, 91; cf.:

    quid id ad me aut ad meam rem refert,

    id. Pers. 4, 3, 44:

    refert etiam ad fructus, quemadmodum vicinus in confinio consitum agrum habeat,

    Varr. R. R. 1, 16 fin. — In plur.:

    te ex puellā prius percontari volo, Quae ad rem referunt,

    Plaut. Pers. 4, 4, 44:

    quoi rei id te assimulare rettulit?

    id. Truc. 2, 4, 40:

    dic, quid referat intra Naturae fines viventi, jugera centum an Mille aret?

    Hor. S. 1, 1, 49:

    quin et verba Flavii vulgabantur, non referre dedecori, si citharoedus demoveretur et tragoedus succederet,

    Tac. A. 15, 65:

    faciundum aliquid, quod illorum magis quam suā retulisse videretur,

    Sall. J.111, 1:

    praefatus... et ipsorum referre, si quos suspectos status praesens rerum faceret,

    Liv. 34, 27, 6:

    quorum nihil refert, ubi litium cardo vertatur,

    Quint. 12, 8, 2:

    neque refert cujusquam, Punicas Romanasve acies laetius extuleris,

    Tac. A. 4, 33:

    ipsius certe ducis hoc referre videtur,

    Juv. 16, 58:

    plurimum refert compositionis, quae quibus anteponas,

    Quint. 9, 4, 44:

    tu nihil referre iniquitatis existimas, exigas, quod deberi non oportuerit, an constituas, ut debeatur?

    Plin. Pan. 40 fin.:

    quem insignire exempli nonnihil, non insignire humanitatis plurimum refert,

    id. Ep. 8, 22, 4:

    nec minimo sane discrimine refert, Quo gestu lepores et quo gallina secetur,

    Juv. 5, 123. — Rarely with a subst. as subj.:

    adeo magni refert studium atque voluptas, et quibus in rebus consuerint esse operati homines,

    Lucr. 4, 984:

    adeo incessus in gravida refert,

    Plin. 7, 6, 5, § 42:

    longitudo in his refert, non crassitudo,

    id. 18, 31, 74, § 317:

    multum tamen in iis refert et locorum natura,

    id. 11, 51, 112, § 267:

    plurimum refert soli cujusque ratio,

    id. 18, 21, 50, § 187.

    Lewis & Short latin dictionary > re fert

  • 2 refert

    rēfert (or separately rē fert), tŭlit, ferre, v. n. and impers. (plur. rarely personal; v. II. infra) [res - fero; the ancients regarded rē in this word as derived from res; cf. Fest. s. v. refert, p. 282 Müll.]; prop., it follows from or in view of a thing, i. q. ex re est; hence, it is for one ' s interest or advantage, it profits; or, in gen., it befits, matters, imports, concerns, it is of importance or consequence (syn.: juvat, conducit, attinet; freq. and class.); constr.,
    I.
    In all periods and in all kinds of composition, refert hoc ( id, illud, etc., a subj.-clause) meā ( tuā, etc., qs. fert re meā, tuā, etc.; cf. Prisc. p. 1077 P.) magni ( pluris, quanti, etc., nihil, quid?), or absol.
    (α).
    Hoc meā refert, etc. (in Cic. very rare;

    whereas interest meā occurs very freq.): tua istuc refert maxime,

    Plaut. Trin. 2, 2, 38:

    tua istuc refert, si curaveris,

    id. Am. 2, 2, 109:

    id mea minime refert,

    Ter. Ad. 5, 4, 27:

    quod refert tua,

    Plaut. Pers. 4, 3, 50:

    nihilo pol pluris tua hoc, quam quanti illud refert meā,

    id. Rud. 4, 3, 27:

    meā quidem istuc nihil refert,

    id. Pers. 4, 3, 68:

    id tuā refert nihil, utrum illae fecerint,

    Ter. Hec. 4, 3, 12:

    tuā quod nihil refert, ne Cures,

    Plaut. Stich. 2, 1, 48:

    tuā quod nihil refert, percontari desinas,

    Ter. Hec. 5, 3, 12:

    non ascripsi id, quod tuā nihil referebat,

    Cic. Fam. 5, 20, 5:

    quid id meā refert?

    Plaut. Curc. 3, 25; 4, 2, 44; id. Merc. 2, 3, 117:

    quid id refert tuā?

    id. Curc. 3, 88; id. Rud. 1, 2, 88; Ter. Phorm. 4, 5, 11.—With subj.-clause:

    quid meā refert, hae Athenis natae an Thebis sient?

    Plaut. Rud. 3, 4, 41.—
    (β).
    Hoc refert, etc.:

    quomodo habeas, illud refert, jurene an injuriā,

    Plaut. Rud. 4, 4, 25:

    ne illud quidem refert, consul an dictator an praetor spoponderit,

    Liv. 9, 9:

    illud permagni referre arbitror, Ut ne scientem sentiat te id sibi dare,

    Ter. Heaut. 3, 1, 58:

    primum illud parvi refert, nos publicanis amissis vectigalia postea victoria reciperare,

    Cic. Imp. Pomp. 7, 18:

    magni quod refert,

    Lucr. 2, 760:

    at quibus servis? refert enim magno opere id ipsum,

    Cic. Cael. 23, 57: quanti id refert? Vatin. ap. Cic. Fam. 5, 9, 1. — With subject-clause:

    parvi retulit Non suscepisse,

    Ter. Phorm. 4, 3, 41; cf.:

    parvi refert abs te ipso jus dici aequabiliter, nisi, etc.,

    Cic. Q. Fr. 1, 1, 7:

    quanti refert, te nec recte dicere, qui nihili faciat?

    Plaut. Ps. 4, 6, 23:

    meminero, sed quid meminisse id refert?

    id. Mil. 3, 1, 214:

    quid mihi refert Chrysalo esse nomen, nisi, etc.,

    id. Bacch. 4, 4, 53:

    quid te igitur rettulit Beneficum esse oratione, si, etc.,

    id. Ep. 1, 2, 13:

    neque refert videre, quid dicendum sit, nisi, etc.,

    Cic. Brut. 29, 110:

    neque enim numero comprehendere refert,

    nor indeed is it necessary, need we, Verg. G. 2, 104: nec dicaris aliquid, quod referret scire, reticuisse, Cael. ap. Cic. Fam. 8, 10, 2.—With [p. 1546] inf. pass.:

    jam nec mutari pabula refert,

    Verg. G. 3, 548; cf.:

    plures e familiā cognosci referre arbitror,

    Suet. Ner. 1. — With a rel. subj.-clause (so most freq. in the class. per.):

    ipsi animi magni refert quali in corpore locati sint,

    Cic. Tusc. 1, 33, 80: magni refert, hic quid velit, Caes. ap. Cic. Att. 14, 1, 2:

    cum ego ista omnia bona dixero, tantum refert, quam magna dicam,

    Cic. Fin. 5, 30, 90:

    quasi vero referat quam id saepe fiat,

    id. Div. 2, 29, 62:

    quid refert, quā me ratione cogatis?

    id. Lael. 8, 26:

    quid refert, utrum voluerim fieri, an gaudeam factum?

    id. Phil. 2, 12, 29:

    quid refert, tanto post ad judices deferantur, an omnino non deferantur?

    id. Fl. 9, 21:

    quae (aves) pascantur nec ne, quid refert?

    id. Div. 2, 34, 72:

    tuo vitio rerumne labores, Nil referre putas?

    Hor. S. 1, 2, 77:

    cum referre negas, quali sit quisque parente Natus,

    id. ib. 1, 6, 7 et saep.:

    quod tu istis lacrimis te probare postulas, Non pluris refert, quam si imbrem in cribrum geras,

    Plaut. Ps. 1, 1, 100; cf.:

    tantum retulerit, ut in transferendis seminibus similem statum caeli locique observemus,

    Col. 3, 9, 7. —
    (γ).
    Refert, etc.: Do. Hae (tabellae) quid ad me? To. Immo ad te attinent, Et tuā refert, Plaut. Pers. 4, 3, 28: Ep. Tua pol refert enim? Ge. Si quidem meā refert, operā utere, id. Stich. 4, 2, 36:

    quid tuā refert, qui cum istac venerit?

    id. Merc. 5, 2, 65:

    non plus suā referre, quam si, etc.,

    Cic. Quint. 5, 19:

    quos, cum nihil refert, pudet,

    Plaut. Ep. 2, 1, 1:

    cum nihilo pluris referet, quam si, etc.,

    id. Bacch. 3, 4, 20:

    nego et negando si quid refert, ravio,

    id. Poen. 3, 5, 33:

    si servus est, numquid refert?

    id. Ps. 2, 4, 28:

    quid refert, si hoc ipsum salsum illi et venustum videbatur?

    Cic. N. D. 1, 28, 79 et saep. —
    * (δ).
    Entirely absol.:

    bona Sejani ablata aerario, ut in fiscum cogerentur, tamquam referret,

    as though it mattered, as if there were any difference, Tac. A. 6, 2.—
    II.
    Analogous to attinet, conducit, and interest; it is of importance; it belongs, relates, concerns, etc.; constr., refert hoc, id, etc. (once referunt haec), ad aliquem, alicui, alicujus, etc. (mostly ante-class. and post-Aug.; but, with alicujus, once in Sall. and once in Liv.): quam ad rem istuc refert? Plaut Ep. 2, 2, 91; cf.:

    quid id ad me aut ad meam rem refert,

    id. Pers. 4, 3, 44:

    refert etiam ad fructus, quemadmodum vicinus in confinio consitum agrum habeat,

    Varr. R. R. 1, 16 fin. — In plur.:

    te ex puellā prius percontari volo, Quae ad rem referunt,

    Plaut. Pers. 4, 4, 44:

    quoi rei id te assimulare rettulit?

    id. Truc. 2, 4, 40:

    dic, quid referat intra Naturae fines viventi, jugera centum an Mille aret?

    Hor. S. 1, 1, 49:

    quin et verba Flavii vulgabantur, non referre dedecori, si citharoedus demoveretur et tragoedus succederet,

    Tac. A. 15, 65:

    faciundum aliquid, quod illorum magis quam suā retulisse videretur,

    Sall. J.111, 1:

    praefatus... et ipsorum referre, si quos suspectos status praesens rerum faceret,

    Liv. 34, 27, 6:

    quorum nihil refert, ubi litium cardo vertatur,

    Quint. 12, 8, 2:

    neque refert cujusquam, Punicas Romanasve acies laetius extuleris,

    Tac. A. 4, 33:

    ipsius certe ducis hoc referre videtur,

    Juv. 16, 58:

    plurimum refert compositionis, quae quibus anteponas,

    Quint. 9, 4, 44:

    tu nihil referre iniquitatis existimas, exigas, quod deberi non oportuerit, an constituas, ut debeatur?

    Plin. Pan. 40 fin.:

    quem insignire exempli nonnihil, non insignire humanitatis plurimum refert,

    id. Ep. 8, 22, 4:

    nec minimo sane discrimine refert, Quo gestu lepores et quo gallina secetur,

    Juv. 5, 123. — Rarely with a subst. as subj.:

    adeo magni refert studium atque voluptas, et quibus in rebus consuerint esse operati homines,

    Lucr. 4, 984:

    adeo incessus in gravida refert,

    Plin. 7, 6, 5, § 42:

    longitudo in his refert, non crassitudo,

    id. 18, 31, 74, § 317:

    multum tamen in iis refert et locorum natura,

    id. 11, 51, 112, § 267:

    plurimum refert soli cujusque ratio,

    id. 18, 21, 50, § 187.

    Lewis & Short latin dictionary > refert

  • 3 Psychoanalysis

       [Psychoanalysis] seeks to prove to the ego that it is not even master in its own house, but must content itself with scanty information of what is going on unconsciously in the mind. (Freud, 1953-1974, Vol. 16, pp. 284-285)
       Although in the interview the analyst is supposedly a "passive" auditor of the "free association" narration by the subject, in point of fact the analyst does direct the course of the narrative. This by itself does not necessarily impair the evidential worth of the outcome, for even in the most meticulously conducted laboratory experiment the experimenter intervenes to obtain the data he is after. There is nevertheless the difficulty that in the nature of the case the full extent of the analyst's intervention is not a matter that is open to public scrutiny, so that by and large one has only his own testimony as to what transpires in the consulting room. It is perhaps unnecessary to say that this is not a question about the personal integrity of psychoanalytic practitioners. The point is the fundamental one that no matter how firmly we may resolve to make explicit our biases, no human being is aware of all of them, and that objectivity in science is achieved through the criticism of publicly accessible material by a community of independent inquirers.... Moreover, unless data are obtained under carefully standardized circumstances, or under different circumstances whose dependence on known variables is nevertheless established, even an extensive collection of data is an unreliable basis for inference. To be sure, analysts apparently do attempt to institute standard conditions for the conduct of interviews. But there is not much information available on the extent to which the standardization is actually enforced, or whether it relates to more than what may be superficial matters. (E. Nagel, 1959, pp. 49-50)
       3) No Necessary Incompatibility between Psychoanalysis and Certain Religious Formulations
       here would seem to be no necessary incompatibility between psychoanalysis and those religious formulations which locate God within the self. One could, indeed, argue that Freud's Id (and even more Groddeck's It), the impersonal force within which is both the core of oneself and yet not oneself, and from which in illness one become[s] alienated, is a secular formation of the insight which makes religious people believe in an immanent God. (Ryecroft, 1966, p. 22)
       Freudian analysts emphasized that their theories were constantly verified by their "clinical observations."... It was precisely this fact-that they always fitted, that they were always confirmed-which in the eyes of their admirers constituted the strongest argument in favour of these theories. It began to dawn on me that this apparent strength was in fact their weakness.... It is easy to obtain confirmations or verifications, for nearly every theory-if we look for confirmation. (Popper, 1968, pp. 3435)
       5) Psychoanalysis Is Not a Science But Rather the Interpretation of a Narrated History
       Psychoanalysis does not satisfy the standards of the sciences of observation, and the "facts" it deals with are not verifiable by multiple, independent observers.... There are no "facts" nor any observation of "facts" in psychoanalysis but rather the interpretation of a narrated history. (Ricoeur, 1974, p. 186)
       6) Some of the Qualities of a Scientific Approach Are Possessed by Psychoanalysis
       In sum: psychoanalysis is not a science, but it shares some of the qualities associated with a scientific approach-the search for truth, understanding, honesty, openness to the import of the observation and evidence, and a skeptical stance toward authority. (Breger, 1981, p. 50)
       [Attributes of Psychoanalysis:]
       1. Psychic Determinism. No item in mental life and in conduct and behavior is "accidental"; it is the outcome of antecedent conditions.
       2. Much mental activity and behavior is purposive or goal-directed in character.
       3. Much of mental activity and behavior, and its determinants, is unconscious in character. 4. The early experience of the individual, as a child, is very potent, and tends to be pre-potent over later experience. (Farrell, 1981, p. 25)
       Our sceptic may be unwise enough... to maintain that, because analytic theory is unscientific on his criterion, it is not worth discussing. This step is unwise, because it presupposes that, if a study is not scientific on his criterion, it is not a rational enterprise... an elementary and egregious mistake. The scientific and the rational are not co-extensive. Scientific work is only one form that rational inquiry can take: there are many others. (Farrell, 1981, p. 46)
       Psychoanalysts have tended to write as though the term analysis spoke for itself, as if the statement "analysis revealed" or "it was analyzed as" preceding a clinical assertion was sufficient to establish the validity of what was being reported. An outsider might easily get the impression from reading the psychoanalytic literature that some standardized, generally accepted procedure existed for both inference and evidence. Instead, exactly the opposite has been true. Clinical material in the hands of one analyst can lead to totally different "findings" in the hands of another. (Peterfreund, 1986, p. 128)
       The analytic process-the means by which we arrive at psychoanalytic understanding-has been largely neglected and is poorly understood, and there has been comparatively little interest in the issues of inference and evidence. Indeed, psychoanalysts as a group have not recognized the importance of being bound by scientific constraints. They do not seem to understand that a possibility is only that-a possibility-and that innumerable ways may exist to explain the same data. Psychoanalysts all too often do not seem to distinguish hypotheses from facts, nor do they seem to understand that hypotheses must be tested in some way, that criteria for evidence must exist, and that any given test for any hypothesis must allow for the full range of substantiation/refutation. (Peterfreund, 1986, p. 129)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Psychoanalysis

  • 4 Knowledge

       It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)
       It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.
       But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)
       Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).
       Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])
       Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....
       This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)
       Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)
       Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)
       "Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.
       Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge

  • 5 vel

    vĕl, conj. and adv. [old imv. of volo] prop., will, choose, take your choice; hence,
    I.
    As disjunctive conjunction, to introduce an alternative as a matter of choice or preference, or as not affecting the principal assertion (while aut introduces an absolute or essential opposition; cf. Madv. Gr. § 436; Zumpt, Gr. § 339; Fischer, Gr. § 383).
    A.
    Singly.
    1.
    In gen., or (if you will), or else, or (at your pleasure), or (at least), or (it is indifferent), or (what is the same thing), etc.:

    dic igitur me passerculum... haedillum me tuom dic esse vel vitellum,

    Plaut. As. 3, 3, 77: viginti minis? Ba. Utrum vis, vel quater quinis minis, id. Ps. 1, 3, 111:

    lege vel tabellas redde,

    id. ib. 1, 1, 29:

    in solem ponito vel sine sale in defrutum condito,

    Cato, R. R. 7: orabant (sc. Ubii), ut sibi auxilium ferret... vel... exercitum modo Rhenum transportaret, or at least, i. e. or, if he preferred it, Caes. B. G. 4, 16:

    ejusmodi conjunctionem tectorum oppidum vel urbem appellaverunt,

    Cic. Rep. 1, 26, 41:

    in unius voluntate vel moribus,

    id. ib. 2, 28, 51:

    in unā urbe vel in hac ipsā,

    id. ib. 3, 10, 17:

    constituere vel conservare,

    id. ib. 2, 38, 64:

    in ardore caelesti, qui aether vel caelum nominatur,

    id. N. D. 2, 15, 41:

    transfer idem ad modestiam vel temperantiam,

    id. Fin. 2, 19, 60; cf. Madv. ad id. ib. 2, 25, 81:

    unum illud extimescebam, ne quid turpiter facerem, vel dicam, jam effecissem,

    id. Att. 9, 7, 1: haec neque confirmare argumentis neque refellere in animo est;

    ex ingenio suo quisque demat vel addat fidem,

    Tac. G. 3.—
    2.
    Esp.
    a.
    With potius, to correct or make more precise what has been said, or rather:

    ex hoc populo indomito vel potius immani,

    Cic. Rep. 1, 44, 68:

    post obitum vel potius excessum Romuli,

    id. ib. 2, 30, 53:

    cessit auctoritati amplissimi viri vel potius paruit,

    id. Lig. 7, 22:

    vide quid licentiae nobis tua liberalitas det, vel potius audaciae,

    id. ib. 8, 23:

    ludorum plausus vel testimonia potius,

    id. Phil. 1, 15, 36:

    quam valde ille reditu vel potius reversione meā laetatus!

    id. Att. 16, 7, 5; id. Phil. 13, 9, 19:

    novem tibi orbibus, vel potius globis conexa sunt omnia,

    id. Rep. 6, 17, 17:

    plurimas vel potius omnes ex se ipso virtutes contulit,

    Quint. 10, 1, 109.—In climax after a negative:

    tu certe numquam in hoc ordine vel potius numquam in hac urbe mansisses,

    Cic. Phil. 2, 15, 38.—
    b.
    So corrective, without potius:

    sed haec tu melius vel optime omnium,

    Cic. Fam. 4, 13, 7:

    clariore vel plane perspicua,

    id. Fin. 5, 20, 55; id. Lael. 12, 41:

    Capua ab duce eorum Capye, vel. quod propius vero est, a campestri agro appellata,

    Liv. 4, 37, 1:

    cum P. Decius se in Samnium vel in Etruriam proficisci paratum esse ostendisset,

    id. 10, 26, 4.—Esp. in the phrase vel dicam, or let me rather say, or rather:

    quando enim nobis, vel dicam aut oratoribus bonis aut poëtis, ullus... ornatus defuit?

    Cic. Fin. 1, 3, 10; id. Brut. 57, 207; id. Cael. 31, 75; id. Phil. 2, 12, 30; id. Att. 9, 7, 1; Suet. Calig. 13.—So intensive, or I may even say (cf. II. A. 3. infra):

    omnes binos consules, vel dicam amplius, omnia nomina,

    Varr. L. L. 8, p. 106 Bip.:

    a plerisque vel dicam ab omnibus,

    Cic. Fam. 4, 7, 3; id. Brut. 70, 246.—
    c.
    Vel etiam, or even:

    ut expositio quarundam rerum gestarum vel etiam fabulosarum,

    Quint. 4, 3, 12. —
    d.
    = aut, or else.
    (α).
    With an alternative necessary consequence:

    id autem nec nasci potest nec mori, vel concidat omne caelum omnisque natura consistat necesse est,

    Cic. Tusc. 1, 23, 54 Tischer ad loc.:

    vel tu ne faceres tale in adulescentiā,

    Plaut. Ps. 1, 5, 22.—
    (β).
    In gen. ( poet. and post class.):

    si copias armatorum... secum expenderent, vincendum illā acie vel cadendum esse,

    Tac. A. 14, 35:

    mortem omnibus ex naturā aequalem oblivione apud posteros vel gloriă distingui,

    id. H. 1, 21; cf. id. A. 14, 61; 14, 62:

    quod imperium variā sorte laetum rei publicae aut atrox, principibus prosperum vel exitio fuit,

    id. H. 2, 1 init.; 2, 10; 2, 68; cf. Ov. M. 9, 624 sq.; 15, 601 sq.—
    e.
    In a subordinate alternative after aut:

    nec aut tibi ipsi aut huic Secundo vel huic Apro ignotas,

    Tac. Or. 28:

    ne contra Gai quidem aut Claudii vel Neronis... domum,

    id. H. 2, 76:

    abscedens in hortos aut Tusculanum vel Antiatem in agrum,

    id. A. 14, 3 init.:

    dementiae quoque judicia aut propter id quod factum est aut propter id quod adhuc fieri vel non fieri potest instituuntur,

    Quint. 7, 4, 29.—
    B.
    As co-ordinate.
    1.
    Vel... vel, either... or, be it... or; in gen. (class.; but where the alternatives are necessary and exclusive, that is, where one must be right and the other wrong, aut... aut is used; v. infra, and cf. Madv. ad Cic. Fin. 4, 11, 27): sed hic numquis adest? Pa. Vel adest vel non, i. e. just as you please, Plaut. Mil. 4, 2, 28 Brix ad loc.:

    paucis me misit ad eam... vel ut ducentos Philippos reddat aureos, vel ut hinc eat secum,

    id. Bacch. 4, 1, 18 sq.:

    ubi illic biberit, vel servato meum modum vel ego dabo,

    id. Stich. 5, 4, 37:

    vel tu me vende, vel face quod tibi lubet,

    id. Pers. 3, 1, 70:

    nunc quamobrem huc sum missa, amabo, vel tu mihi ajas, vel neges,

    id. Rud. 2, 4, 14; cf. id. ib. 5, 2, 44:

    Allobrogibus sese vel persuasuros... existimabant, vel vi coacturos, ut, etc.,

    Caes. B. G. 1, 6:

    ut (Romani) vel sibi agros attribuant vel patiantur eos tenere, etc.,

    id. ib. 4, 7:

    vel sumptuosae vel desidiosae illecebrae,

    Cic. Rep. 2, 4, 8:

    in omni vel officio vel sermone sollers,

    id. ib. 2, 21, 37:

    maximum virtutis vel documentum, vel officium,

    id. ib. 1, 20, 33:

    pace vel Quirini vel Romuli dixerim,

    id. Off. 3, 10, 42:

    erant quaestiones vel de caede vel de vi,

    id. Mil. 5, 13; 7, 20; id. Leg. 3, 14, 32; id. Lig. 6, 17; id. Deiot. 1, 1; 5, 13; id. Brut. 69, 242:

    animus vel bello vel paci paratus,

    Liv. 1, 1, 8:

    hunc ordinem ex censu descripsit vel paci decorum vel bello,

    id. 1, 42, 5: Etruriam et Samnium provincias esse;

    utram mallet eligeret: suo exercitu se vel in Etruriā vel in Samnio rem gesturum,

    id. 10, 19, 9:

    gladioque ruptis omnibus loris, oraculi sortem vel elusit vel implevit,

    Curt. 3, 1, 18:

    nihil illo fuisset excellentius vel in vitiis vel in virtutibus,

    Nep. Alcib. 1, 1; 2, 1; id. Milt. 3, 4.—
    b.
    Connected with aut, but not corresponding to it (cf. infra, 2. e.):

    num aut tuum aut cujusquam nostrum nomen vel Caucasum hunc transcendere potuit vel illum Gangem transnatare?

    Cic. Rep. 6, 20, 22:

    ubi enim potest illa aetas aut calescere vel apricatione melius vel igni aut vicissim umbris aquisve refrigerari salubrius?

    id. Sen. 16, 57:

    si velim scribere quid aut legere aut canere vel voce vel fidibus, aut geometricum quiddam aut physicum aut dialecticum explicare, etc.,

    id. Div. 2, 59, 122.—
    2.
    Esp.
    a.
    With weakened disjunctive force (nearly = et... et). quemadmodum ille vel Athenis vel Rhodi se doctissimorum hominum sermonibus dedisset, Cic. de Or. 2, 1, 3:

    multos sine ratione, sine litteris, quā vel inpudentia vel fames duxit, ruentes,

    Quint. 2, 20, 2:

    affectus vel illos mites vel hos concitatos in suā potestate habuisse,

    id. 10, 1, 48: eadem quaestio potest eundem vel accusatorem facere vel reum, id. 3, 6, 18: et nundina vetera ex ordine instituit, vel dies vel tempora, Lampr Alex. Sev. 43: pestilentia tanta exstiterat vel Romae, vel Achaicis urbibus, ut, etc., Treb. Gall. 5.—
    b.
    More than twice, either... or... or, etc. tu vel suda, vel peri algu, vel tu aegrota, vel vale, Plaut. Rud. 2, 7, 24:

    hance tu mihi vel vi vel clam vel precario Fac tradas: meā nil re fert, dum potiar modo,

    Ter. Eun. 2, 3, 28:

    vel in tempestate, vel in agris, vel in corporibus,

    Cic. Rep. 1, 44, 68:

    vel quod ita vivit vel quod ita rem publicam gerit vel quod ita factus est,

    id. Phil. 2, 5, 10:

    vel spectator laudum tuarum vel particeps vel socius vel minister consiliorum,

    id. Fam. 2, 7, 2; id. Red. Quir. 9, 23;

    so eight times,

    id. Rep. 1, 3, 6. —
    c.
    The second (or last) vel strengthened,
    (α).
    By etiam:

    quae vel ad usum vitae vel etiam ad ipsam rem publicam conferre possumus,

    or even, Cic. Rep. 1, 8, 30; so id. ib. 1, 29, 45; 2, 1, 1; cf.:

    ut vel ea defendam, quae Pompejus velit, vel taceam, vel etiam ad nostra me studia referam litterarum,

    id. Fam. 1, 8, 3.—
    (β).
    By vero etiam:

    in mediocribus vel studiis vel officiis, vel vero etiam negotiis,

    Cic. Rep. 1, 3, 4.—
    (γ).
    By omnino: haec vel ad odium, vel ad misericordiam, vel omnino ad animos judicum movendos ex iis quae sunt ante posita, sumentur ( or in general), Cic. Part. Or. 36, 128.—
    d.
    Rarely after a negative = neque, nor:

    neque satis Bruto... vel tribunis militum constabat, quid agerent,

    Caes. B. G. 3, 14.—
    e.
    In irregular construction, without the second vel:

    utrumque est in his, quod ab hoc oratore abhorreat: vel quod omnis, qui sapientes non sint, insanos esse dicunt... accedit quod, etc.,

    Cic. de Or. 3, 18, 65; id. Att. 11, 7, 5; cf. esp. Lucr. 5, 383 sqq. Munro ad loc. —
    f.
    Vel... vel = aut... aut:

    habere ea, quae secundum naturam sint, vel omnia vel plurima et maxima,

    i. e. so nearly all that the difference is unimportant, Cic. Fin. 4, 11, 27; cf.

    Madv. ad loc.: cum bonā quidem spe, ut ait idem, vel vincendi vel in libertate moriendi,

    id. Att. 7, 9, 4.—For vel... vel, in a subordinate alternative after aut, v. the examples under I. B. 1. b. supra.—
    g.
    Vel, correl. with aut (post-Aug. and rare):

    verborum quoque vis ac proprietas confirmatur vel praesumptione... aut reprehensione,

    Quint. 9, 2, 18:

    voces... aut productione tantum vel correptione mutatae,

    id. 9, 3, 69 (but the line Ov. M. 1, 546, is spurious); so,

    aut... aut... vel: ut aut de nomine aut scripto et sententiā vel ratiocinatione quaeratur,

    Quint. 3, 6, 72:

    aut... aut... aut... aut... vel,

    id. 8, 6, 68 sq.; cf.:

    ubi regnat Protogenes aliquis vel Diphilus aut Erimarchus,

    Juv. 3, 120.
    II.
    As intens. particle (prop. ellipt., implying an alternative the first member of which is omitted, something else or even this, etc.).
    A.
    In gen., or even, if you will, or indeed, or... itself, even, assuredly, certainly.
    1.
    With subst.:

    tum opsonium autem pol vel legioni sat est,

    Plaut. Aul. 3, 6, 24; id. Capt. 1, 2, 23; id. Curc. 5, 2, 13:

    ita me di ament, vel in lautumiis, vel in pistrino mavelim Agere aetatem, Quam, etc.,

    Plaut. Poen. 4, 2, 5: Ep. Si arte poteris accubare. Ge. Vel inter cuneos ferreos, id. Stich. 4, 2, 39:

    vel rex semper maxumas Mihi agebat gratias,

    Ter. Eun. 3, 1, 7:

    sed tamen vel regnum malo quam liberum populum,

    Cic. Rep. 3, 34, 46:

    isto quidem modo vel consulatus vituperabilis est,

    id. Leg. 3, 10, 23:

    cum se vel principes ejus consilii fore profiterentur,

    Caes. B. G. 7, 37:

    vel Priamo miseranda manus,

    Verg. A. 11, 259:

    ego vel Prochytam praepono Suburae,

    Juv. 3, 5:

    facile me paterer vel illo ipso acerrimo judice quaerente vel apud Cassianos judices... pro Sex. Roscio dicere,

    Cic. Rosc. Am. 30, 85:

    populus Romanus auctoritatem suam vel contra omnes defendere potest,

    even if necessary, id. Imp. Pomp. 22, 63:

    id se probaturum vel ipso Verginio judice,

    Liv. 3, 44, 10:

    belli necessitatibus eam patientiam non adhibebimus, quam vel lusus ac voluptas elicere solet?

    id. 5, 6, 3:

    timebant ne Romana plebs... vel cum servitute pacem acciperet,

    even if it should involve their enslavement, id. 2, 9, 5.—
    2.
    With adjj.: Ch. Pax, te tribus verbis volo. Sy. Vel trecentis, Plaut. Trin. 4, 2, 122: Ca. Ut opperiare hos sex dies saltem modo... Ba. Animo bono es. Vel sex mensis opperibor, id. Ps. 1, 3, 89; cf.: jam hercle vel ducentae [p. 1964] minae, id. ib. 1, 3, 68;

    1, 3, 111: hoc ascensu vel tres armati quamlibet multitudinem arcuerint,

    Liv. 9, 24, 7: Ph. Dane suavium? Di. Immo vel decem, Plaut. Truc. 2, 4, 22:

    ego illum eunuchum, si opus sit, vel sobrius,

    Ter. Eun. 3, 2, 26:

    si sit opus, vel totum triduom,

    id. ib. 2, 1, 17:

    haec sunt omnia ingenii vel mediocris,

    Cic. de Or. 2, 27, 119.—
    3.
    With verbs: namque edepol quamvis desubito vel cadus vorti potest, may even be turned over, i. e. will be empty, Plaut. Stich. 5, 4, 39:

    ubi ego hinc abiero, vel occidito,

    if you will, even, Ter. Phorm. 1, 2, 93:

    per me vel stertas licet, inquit Carneades, non modo quiescas,

    Cic. Ac. 2, 29, 93:

    ut ipsis sententiis, quibus proluserunt, vel pugnare possint,

    id. de Or. 2, 80, 325:

    cum vel abundare debeam, cogor mutuari,

    id. Att. 15 15, 3—
    4.
    With pronn.:

    videndum erit, quid quisque vel sine nobis aut possit consequi aut non possit,

    Cic. Off. 1, 18, 59:

    existiment quod velint, ac vel hoc intellegant,

    id. Fin. 5, 11, 33:

    est tibi ex his ipsis qui assunt bella copia, vel ut a te ipso ordiare,

    especially as you can begin with yourself, id. Rep. 2, 40, 67.—
    B.
    With superlatives, to denote the highest possible degree, the very; the utmost; the most...possible.
    1.
    With adjj.: hoc invenisset unum ad morbum illum homini vel bellissimum, the very loveliest, the most beautiful possible, Lucil. ap. Non. 527, 28:

    vidi in dolore podagrae ipsum vel omnium maximum Stoicorum Posidonium,

    Cic. Fragm. ib. 32:

    hoc in genere nervorum vel minimum, suavitatis autem est vel plurimum,

    the very least... the utmost possible, id. Or. 26, 91:

    quarum duarum (civitatum) si adessent (legationes), duo crimina vel maxima minuerentur,

    id. Div. in Caecil. 5, 14:

    patre meā sententiā vel eloquentissimo temporibus illis,

    the most eloquent possible, id. de Or. 2, 23, 98:

    quod erat ad obtinendam potentiam nobilium vel maximum, vehementer id retinebatur,

    id. Rep. 2, 32, 56:

    cujus (sc. Hannibalis) eo tempore vel maxima apud regem auctoritas erat,

    Liv. 36, 41, 2:

    vident unum senatorem vel tenuissimum esse damnatum,

    Cic. Verr. 1, 16, 46:

    fora templaque occupabantur, ut vel exspectatissimi triumphi laetitia praecipi posset,

    Hirt. B. G. 8, 51:

    sed vel potentissima apud Amphictyonas aequi tractatio est,

    Quint. 5, 10, 118; 11, 1, 81.—
    2.
    With advv.:

    vel studiosissime quaerere,

    Cic. Rep. 1, 10, 15:

    cum Sophocles vel optime scripserit Electram,

    id. Fin. 1, 2, 5:

    vel maxime confirmare,

    id. N. D. 2, 65, 162; so,

    vel maxime,

    id. Ac. 2, 3, 9; id. de Or. 1, 8, 32; id. Att. 9, 12, 3; Quint. 1, 3, 12; 4, 3, 4.—
    C.
    In adding an instance implying that other instances might be mentioned at will, or this one; for instance, for example, as for example, in particular:

    Per pol quam paucos reperias Fideles amatores... Vel hic Pamphilus jurabat quotiens Bacchidi, etc.,

    Ter. Hec. 1, 1, 3:

    vel heri in vino quam inmodestus fuisti,

    id. Heaut. 3, 3, 7: nullast tam facilis res quin difficilis siet Quom invitus facias;

    vel me haec deambulatio... ad languorum dedit,

    id. ib. 4, 6, 1:

    sed suavis accipio litteras, vel quas proxime acceperam, quam prudentis!

    Cic. Fam. 2, 13, 1:

    cujus innumerabilia sunt exempla, vel Appii majoris illius, qui, etc.,

    id. de Or. 2, 70, 284.—
    D.
    Concessive.
    1.
    With superlatives, perhaps:

    adulescens vel potentissimus nostrae civitatis,

    Cic. Rosc. A. 2, 6:

    domus vel optima Messanae, notissima quidem certe,

    the best known, at any rate, if not the finest, id. Verr. 2, 4, 2, § 3.—
    2.
    = saltem, at least:

    quā re etsi minus veram causam habebis, tamen vel probabilem aliquam poteris inducere,

    Cic. Fam. 11, 22, 2:

    plurimi semetipsos exhortantur vel aliquas partes earum (scientiarum) addiscere, quamvis universas percipere non possint,

    Col. 11, 1, 11:

    ac, ni flexisset animos, vel Aegypti praefecturam concedi sibi oraret,

    Suet. Ner. 47:

    ut messe vel unā releves colla perusta,

    Mart. 10, 12, 5; Plin. Ep. 1, 12, 8; cf. Madv. ad Cic. Fin. 4, 16, 43.

    Lewis & Short latin dictionary > vel

  • 6 Psychology

       We come therefore now to that knowledge whereunto the ancient oracle directeth us, which is the knowledge of ourselves; which deserveth the more accurate handling, by how much it toucheth us more nearly. This knowledge, as it is the end and term of natural philosophy in the intention of man, so notwithstanding it is but a portion of natural philosophy in the continent of nature.... [W]e proceed to human philosophy or Humanity, which hath two parts: the one considereth man segregate, or distributively; the other congregate, or in society. So as Human philosophy is either Simple and Particular, or Conjugate and Civil. Humanity Particular consisteth of the same parts whereof man consisteth; that is, of knowledges which respect the Body, and of knowledges that respect the Mind... how the one discloseth the other and how the one worketh upon the other... [:] the one is honored with the inquiry of Aristotle, and the other of Hippocrates. (Bacon, 1878, pp. 236-237)
       The claims of Psychology to rank as a distinct science are... not smaller but greater than those of any other science. If its phenomena are contemplated objectively, merely as nervo-muscular adjustments by which the higher organisms from moment to moment adapt their actions to environing co-existences and sequences, its degree of specialty, even then, entitles it to a separate place. The moment the element of feeling, or consciousness, is used to interpret nervo-muscular adjustments as thus exhibited in the living beings around, objective Psychology acquires an additional, and quite exceptional, distinction. (Spencer, 1896, p. 141)
       Kant once declared that psychology was incapable of ever raising itself to the rank of an exact natural science. The reasons that he gives... have often been repeated in later times. In the first place, Kant says, psychology cannot become an exact science because mathematics is inapplicable to the phenomena of the internal sense; the pure internal perception, in which mental phenomena must be constructed,-time,-has but one dimension. In the second place, however, it cannot even become an experimental science, because in it the manifold of internal observation cannot be arbitrarily varied,-still less, another thinking subject be submitted to one's experiments, comformably to the end in view; moreover, the very fact of observation means alteration of the observed object. (Wundt, 1904, p. 6)
       It is [Gustav] Fechner's service to have found and followed the true way; to have shown us how a "mathematical psychology" may, within certain limits, be realized in practice.... He was the first to show how Herbart's idea of an "exact psychology" might be turned to practical account. (Wundt, 1904, pp. 6-7)
       "Mind," "intellect," "reason," "understanding," etc. are concepts... that existed before the advent of any scientific psychology. The fact that the naive consciousness always and everywhere points to internal experience as a special source of knowledge, may, therefore, be accepted for the moment as sufficient testimony to the rights of psychology as science.... "Mind," will accordingly be the subject, to which we attribute all the separate facts of internal observation as predicates. The subject itself is determined p. 17) wholly and exclusively by its predicates. (Wundt, 1904,
       The study of animal psychology may be approached from two different points of view. We may set out from the notion of a kind of comparative physiology of mind, a universal history of the development of mental life in the organic world. Or we may make human psychology the principal object of investigation. Then, the expressions of mental life in animals will be taken into account only so far as they throw light upon the evolution of consciousness in man.... Human psychology... may confine itself altogether to man, and generally has done so to far too great an extent. There are plenty of psychological text-books from which you would hardly gather that there was any other conscious life than the human. (Wundt, 1907, pp. 340-341)
       The Behaviorist began his own formulation of the problem of psychology by sweeping aside all medieval conceptions. He dropped from his scientific vocabulary all subjective terms such as sensation, perception, image, desire, purpose, and even thinking and emotion as they were subjectively defined. (Watson, 1930, pp. 5-6)
       According to the medieval classification of the sciences, psychology is merely a chapter of special physics, although the most important chapter; for man is a microcosm; he is the central figure of the universe. (deWulf, 1956, p. 125)
       At the beginning of this century the prevailing thesis in psychology was Associationism.... Behavior proceeded by the stream of associations: each association produced its successors, and acquired new attachments with the sensations arriving from the environment.
       In the first decade of the century a reaction developed to this doctrine through the work of the Wurzburg school. Rejecting the notion of a completely self-determining stream of associations, it introduced the task ( Aufgabe) as a necessary factor in describing the process of thinking. The task gave direction to thought. A noteworthy innovation of the Wurzburg school was the use of systematic introspection to shed light on the thinking process and the contents of consciousness. The result was a blend of mechanics and phenomenalism, which gave rise in turn to two divergent antitheses, Behaviorism and the Gestalt movement. The behavioristic reaction insisted that introspection was a highly unstable, subjective procedure.... Behaviorism reformulated the task of psychology as one of explaining the response of organisms as a function of the stimuli impinging upon them and measuring both objectively. However, Behaviorism accepted, and indeed reinforced, the mechanistic assumption that the connections between stimulus and response were formed and maintained as simple, determinate functions of the environment.
       The Gestalt reaction took an opposite turn. It rejected the mechanistic nature of the associationist doctrine but maintained the value of phenomenal observation. In many ways it continued the Wurzburg school's insistence that thinking was more than association-thinking has direction given to it by the task or by the set of the subject. Gestalt psychology elaborated this doctrine in genuinely new ways in terms of holistic principles of organization.
       Today psychology lives in a state of relatively stable tension between the poles of Behaviorism and Gestalt psychology.... (Newell & Simon, 1963, pp. 279-280)
       As I examine the fate of our oppositions, looking at those already in existence as guide to how they fare and shape the course of science, it seems to me that clarity is never achieved. Matters simply become muddier and muddier as we go down through time. Thus, far from providing the rungs of a ladder by which psychology gradually climbs to clarity, this form of conceptual structure leads rather to an ever increasing pile of issues, which we weary of or become diverted from, but never really settle. (Newell, 1973b, pp. 288-289)
       The subject matter of psychology is as old as reflection. Its broad practical aims are as dated as human societies. Human beings, in any period, have not been indifferent to the validity of their knowledge, unconcerned with the causes of their behavior or that of their prey and predators. Our distant ancestors, no less than we, wrestled with the problems of social organization, child rearing, competition, authority, individual differences, personal safety. Solving these problems required insights-no matter how untutored-into the psychological dimensions of life. Thus, if we are to follow the convention of treating psychology as a young discipline, we must have in mind something other than its subject matter. We must mean that it is young in the sense that physics was young at the time of Archimedes or in the sense that geometry was "founded" by Euclid and "fathered" by Thales. Sailing vessels were launched long before Archimedes discovered the laws of bouyancy [ sic], and pillars of identical circumference were constructed before anyone knew that C IID. We do not consider the ship builders and stone cutters of antiquity physicists and geometers. Nor were the ancient cave dwellers psychologists merely because they rewarded the good conduct of their children. The archives of folk wisdom contain a remarkable collection of achievements, but craft-no matter how perfected-is not science, nor is a litany of successful accidents a discipline. If psychology is young, it is young as a scientific discipline but it is far from clear that psychology has attained this status. (Robinson, 1986, p. 12)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Psychology

  • 7 Science

       It is a common notion, or at least it is implied in many common modes of speech, that the thoughts, feelings, and actions of sentient beings are not a subject of science.... This notion seems to involve some confusion of ideas, which it is necessary to begin by clearing up. Any facts are fitted, in themselves, to be a subject of science, which follow one another according to constant laws; although those laws may not have been discovered, nor even to be discoverable by our existing resources. (Mill, 1900, B. VI, Chap. 3, Sec. 1)
       One class of natural philosophers has always a tendency to combine the phenomena and to discover their analogies; another class, on the contrary, employs all its efforts in showing the disparities of things. Both tendencies are necessary for the perfection of science, the one for its progress, the other for its correctness. The philosophers of the first of these classes are guided by the sense of unity throughout nature; the philosophers of the second have their minds more directed towards the certainty of our knowledge. The one are absorbed in search of principles, and neglect often the peculiarities, and not seldom the strictness of demonstration; the other consider the science only as the investigation of facts, but in their laudable zeal they often lose sight of the harmony of the whole, which is the character of truth. Those who look for the stamp of divinity on every thing around them, consider the opposite pursuits as ignoble and even as irreligious; while those who are engaged in the search after truth, look upon the other as unphilosophical enthusiasts, and perhaps as phantastical contemners of truth.... This conflict of opinions keeps science alive, and promotes it by an oscillatory progress. (Oersted, 1920, p. 352)
       Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone. (Einstein & Infeld, 1938, p. 27)
       A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. (Planck, 1949, pp. 33-34)
       [Original quotation: "Eine neue wissenschaftliche Wahrheit pflegt sich nicht in der Weise durchzusetzen, dass ihre Gegner ueberzeugt werden und sich as belehrt erklaeren, sondern vielmehr dadurch, dass die Gegner allmaehlich aussterben und dass die heranwachsende Generation von vornherein mit der Wahrheit vertraut gemacht ist." (Planck, 1990, p. 15)]
       I had always looked upon the search for the absolute as the noblest and most worth while task of science. (Planck, 1949, p. 46)
       If you cannot-in the long run-tell everyone what you have been doing, your doing has been worthless. (SchroЁdinger, 1951, pp. 7-8)
       Even for the physicist the description in plain language will be a criterion of the degree of understanding that has been reached. (Heisenberg, 1958, p. 168)
       The old scientific ideal of episteґmeґ-of absolutely certain, demonstrable knowledge-has proved to be an idol. The demand for scientific objectivity makes it inevitable that every scientific statement must remain tentative forever. It may indeed be corroborated, but every corroboration is relative to other statements which, again, are tentative. Only in our subjective experiences of conviction, in our subjective faith, can we be "absolutely certain." (Popper, 1959, p. 280)
       The layman, taught to revere scientists for their absolute respect for the observed facts, and for the judiciously detached and purely provisional manner in which they hold scientific theories (always ready to abandon a theory at the sight of any contradictory evidence) might well have thought that, at Miller's announcement of this overwhelming evidence of a "positive effect" [indicating that the speed of light is not independent from the motion of the observer, as Einstein's theory of relativity demands] in his presidential address to the American Physical Society on December 29th, 1925, his audience would have instantly abandoned the theory of relativity. Or, at the very least, that scientists-wont to look down from the pinnacle of their intellectual humility upon the rest of dogmatic mankind-might suspend judgment in this matter until Miller's results could be accounted for without impairing the theory of relativity. But no: by that time they had so well closed their minds to any suggestion which threatened the new rationality achieved by Einstein's world-picture, that it was almost impossible for them to think again in different terms. Little attention was paid to the experiments, the evidence being set aside in the hope that it would one day turn out to be wrong. (Polanyi, 1958, pp. 12-13)
       The practice of normal science depends on the ability, acquired from examplars, to group objects and situations into similarity sets which are primitive in the sense that the grouping is done without an answer to the question, "Similar with respect to what?" (Kuhn, 1970, p. 200)
       Science in general... does not consist in collecting what we already know and arranging it in this or that kind of pattern. It consists in fastening upon something we do not know, and trying to discover it. (Collingwood, 1972, p. 9)
       Scientific fields emerge as the concerns of scientists congeal around various phenomena. Sciences are not defined, they are recognized. (Newell, 1973a, p. 1)
       This is often the way it is in physics-our mistake is not that we take our theories too seriously, but that we do not take them seriously enough. I do not think it is possible really to understand the successes of science without understanding how hard it is-how easy it is to be led astray, how difficult it is to know at any time what is the next thing to be done. (Weinberg, 1977, p. 49)
       Science is wonderful at destroying metaphysical answers, but incapable of providing substitute ones. Science takes away foundations without providing a replacement. Whether we want to be there or not, science has put us in a position of having to live without foundations. It was shocking when Nietzsche said this, but today it is commonplace; our historical position-and no end to it is in sight-is that of having to philosophize without "foundations." (Putnam, 1987, p. 29)

    Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Science

  • 8 rzecz

    f 1. (przedmiot) thing
    - rzeczy osobiste personal belongings
    - biuro rzeczy znalezionych the lost property office
    - zabrał ze sobą tylko najpotrzebniejsze rzeczy he took only the most necessary things with him
    - zabrał wszystkie swoje rzeczy i poszedł he took all his stuff a. belongings and went
    - traktował ją jak swoją rzecz he treated her as his plaything
    2. (sprawa) matter, question
    - to nie twoja rzecz it’s none of your business
    - jej źródło utrzymania to drażliwa rzecz the source of her income is a touchy matter
    3. (nieokreślone zjawisko) thing
    - zajmować się różnymi/wieloma rzeczami to be engaged in various/many things
    - wykształcenie i wychowanie to dwie różne rzeczy education and upbringing are two different things a. matters
    - lubi malować, rysować i w ogóle takie rzeczy pot. he likes painting and drawing and stuff like that pot.
    - jest kilka rzeczy, które lubię, na przykład truskawki there are a number of things I like, for example strawberries
    - ludzie mówili różne rzeczy people were saying all sorts of things
    4. (treść myśli, wypowiedzi) thing
    - brać rzecz dosłownie to take it literally
    - ujmować rzecz jednostronnie to take a one-sided view of the matter
    - mówił o niej nieprzyjemne rzeczy he said unpleasant things about her
    - chciał wyrazić tę rzecz w słowach he tried to express the thing in words
    5. (zadanie, obowiązek) business
    - to nie twoja rzecz it’s none of your business, it’s of no concern to you
    - rzeczą pisarza jest przede wszystkim dostarczanie dzieł literackich it’s a writer’s job to produce literature
    6. (wydarzenie, fakt, okoliczność) thing
    - stała się nieprawdopodobna rzecz an unbelievable thing happened
    - to rzecz naturalna, że młody chłopak się zakochał it’s a natural thing for a young boy to fall in love
    7. Filoz. thing
    - rzecz sama w sobie the thing in itself
    8. (dzieło sztuki, utwór literacki, muzyczny) thing, piece
    - to dobrze napisana rzecz it’s a good piece of writing
    - czytałem ciekawą rzecz I read an interesting thing
    - komponował znakomite rzeczy he composed superb things; he composed great stuff pot.
    ■ (cała) rzecz w tym, że… the thing is, …, the point is…
    - to moja/twoja/jego rzecz it’s my/your/his business
    - rzecz prosta of course, naturally
    - rzecz prosta, pomogę ci, ale… of course, I’ll help you, but…
    - bieg a. kolej a. obrót a. porządek rzeczy a course of events
    - brać się/wziąć się do rzeczy to get down to business; to get down to brass tacks pot.
    - nie od rzeczy będzie/byłoby… it wouldn't be a bad idea to…
    - nie od rzeczy byłoby przypomnieć jego osiągnięcia it would be worthwhile to recall his achievements
    - co to ma do rzeczy? what’s that got to do with it?
    - być do rzeczy to be all right pot.
    - to wypracowanie jest do rzeczy, całkiem niezłe the essay is sensibly written, not bad at all
    - ta dziewczyna jest całkiem do rzeczy the girl’s quite all right
    - nie twoją/jego/jej rzeczą jest…. it’s not your concern to …
    - istota a. sedno rzeczy the heart a. crux of the matter
    - ładne rzeczy! my word!
    - mówić do rzeczy to talk sense
    - mówić od rzeczy a. nie do rzeczy to talk nonsense
    - zbierali datki na rzecz bezdomnych they were collecting money for the homeless
    - nazwać rzecz po imieniu to call a spade a spade
    - nic z tych rzeczy pot. nothing of the kind a. of the sort
    - odbiegać od rzeczy to stray from the point, to digress
    - ogólnie/ściśle rzecz biorąc generally/strictly speaking
    - rzecz idzie o najwyższą stawkę it’s a matter of life and death
    - stan a. postać rzeczy state of affairs
    - to nie ma nic do rzeczy that’s beside the point
    - w samej rzeczy, nie o to mi chodzi in fact, this is not what I mean
    - wiadoma rzecza. jest rzeczą wiadomą, że… it’s a well-known fact that…
    - wiadoma rzecz jak jest w wojsku we all know what it’s like in the army
    - widzieć/wiedzieć, jak rzeczy stoją a. jak się rzeczy mają to know/to see how the land lies
    - lepiej żeby wiedział jak rzeczy stoją it would be better for him to know how matters stand
    - wielkie rzeczy! a. wielka (mi) rzecz! pot. big deal! iron.
    - wielka mi rzecz, każdy umie tak śpiewać! big deal, anyone can sing like that!
    - wracać/przystępować do rzeczy to return/come to the point
    - nie wtrącaj się w nie swoje rzeczy mind your own business
    - z natury rzeczy a. siłą rzeczy (quite) naturally
    - siłą rzeczy musiał tam pojechać events forced him to go there
    - znać się na rzeczy to know what’s what
    * * *
    -y; -y; gen pl; -y; f
    * * *
    f.
    1. (= przedmiot) thing, object.
    2. pl. (= własność, dobytek, strój, wyposażenie) things, belongings, property; to są moje rzeczy these are my things; rzeczy osobiste personal belongings l. possessions; biuro rzeczy znalezionych lost property office.
    3. (= sprawa, dziedzina) ( w wielu utartych wyrażeniach) ładne rzeczy! a pretty kettle of fish!; nic z tych rzeczy nothing of the kind l. sort; te rzeczy są mi obce these things aren't up my street; to moja rzecz it's my business; to nie moja rzecz it's none of my business; wielka mi rzecz! l. wielkie rzeczy! big deal!; wojsko to męska rzecz army life is for men; znać się na rzeczy know one's stuff; be knowledgeable.
    4. pl. (= naturalny bieg spraw) things, affairs; (zwykła) kolej rzeczy the (ordinary) course of things; stan rzeczy the state of affairs; siłą rzeczy of course, naturally; w gruncie rzeczy essentially.
    5. (= temat, treść, t. w licznych utartych zwrotach) issue, matter, topic, point; coś jest na rzeczy there's something in it; co to ma do rzeczy? what does that have to do with the matter at hand?; do rzeczy! back to the point; mówić do rzeczy/od rzeczy talk sense/nonsense; nazywać rzeczy po imieniu call a spade a spade; nie od rzeczy byłoby... it would not be amiss to...; ogólnie rzecz biorąc generally speaking; przystąpić do rzeczy get to the point; address the issue; rzecz w tym, że... the problem is that...; sedno/istota rzeczy the heart/crux of the matter; spis rzeczy (= spis treści) contents; to nie ma nic do rzeczy that's neither here nor there; to zmienia postać rzeczy that makes a difference; w rzeczy samej indeed; w tym (cała) rzecz that's the whole point.
    6. z przymiotnikami ( tworzy równoważniki zdań okolicznikowych) rzecz dziwna... strangely enough...; rzecz jasna... l. rzecz oczywista... of course..., needless to say..., it goes without saying that...; rzecz prosta... predictably (enough)...
    7. na rzecz kogoś/czegoś prawn. to l. for sb/sth; przekazać darowiznę na rzecz instytucji make a donation to l. for an institution; zasądzić coś na czyjąś rzecz adjudge sth to sb.
    8. fil. thing; rzecz sama w sobie thing-in-itself.

    The New English-Polish, Polish-English Kościuszko foundation dictionary > rzecz

  • 9 _жінка; дружина

    all are good lasses, but whence come the bad wives? all women look the same after the sun goes down any woman can keep a secret, but she generally needs one other woman to help her better the devil's than a woman's slave a cat has nine lives; a woman has nine cat's lives a diamond daughter turns to glass as a wife everybody's sweetheart is nobody's wife the fewer the women, the less the trouble the fingers of a housewife do more than a yoke of oxen the first wife is matrimony; the second, company; the third, heresy the grey mare is the better horse the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world handle with care women and glass hanging and wiving goes by destiny happy is the bride that the sun shines on he that has not got a wife is not yet a complete man he who has a fair wife needs more than two eyes hell hath no fury like a woman scorned if it is a secret, don't tell it to a woman it is harder to marry a daughter well than to bring her up well it is a woman's privilege to change her mind it is as great pity to see a woman weep as to see a goose go barefoot ladies don't smoke long hair and short wit the longest five years in a woman's life is between twenty-nine and thirty never choose your woman or your linen by candlelight never praise your wife until you have been married ten years never quarrel with a woman no house was ever big enough for two women no woman is ugly if she is well dressed one tongue is enough for two women the only secret a woman can keep is her age praise from a wife is praise indeed the real housewife is at once a slave and a lady she who is a beauty is half-married she who loves the looking glass hates the saucepan silence is a woman's best garment slander expires at a good woman's door tell a woman and you tell the world ten measures of talk were sent down from heaven, and women took nine there is no fury like a woman's fury there is nothing better than a good woman and nothing worse than a bad one there is one good wife in the country, and every man thinks he has her there's hardly a strife in which a woman has not been a prime mover ugliness is the guardian of women the ugliest woman can look in the mirror and think she is beautiful an undutiful daughter will prove an unmanageable wife when a girl whistles, the angels cry wherever there is a woman, there is gossip a whistling woman and a crowing hen are neither fit for God nor men winter weather and women's thoughts change often a wise woman never outsmarts her husband a woman, a cat, and a chimney should never leave the house a woman fights with her tongue a woman knows a bit more than Satan a woman laughs when she can but cries whenever she wishes the woman who obeys her husband rules him a woman's hair is her crowning glory a woman's hair is long, but her tongue is longer a woman's place is in the home a woman's tongue is one that will never wear out a woman's tongue is the only sharp-edged tool that grows keener with constant use women are necessary evils a woman's work is never done women are strong when they arm themselves with their weaknesses women forgive injuries, but never forget slights women would be more charming if one could fall into their arms without falling into their hands a worthy woman is the crown of her husband

    English-Ukrainian dictionary of proverbs > _жінка; дружина

  • 10 punctuation

    n пунктуация, знаки препинания Знаки препинания в английском языке употребляются реже и не так, как в русском языке. К основным случаям употребления знаков препинания в английском языке следует отнести: (1). Предложения, выражающие просьбу, заканчиваются как правило точкой, даже если они стоят в вопросительной форме:

    Will you send me your latest article.

    May I take it.

    (2). Косвенный вопрос заканчивается точкой, а не вопросительным знаком:

    Do you mind if I come a little later.

    He hesitated whether to stay or leave at once.

    (3). Запятой отделяются:
    1). обстоятельственные придаточные предложения, если они стоят в начале предложения перед главным. Если придаточное следует за главным, то оно запятой не отделяется.

    When it was convenient for him, he went to the office.

    Cp. We worked overtime whenever it was necessary;
    2). причастные и абсолютные обороты, стоящие в начале предложения.

    The rain having stopped, we went for a walk.

    A doctor, called to the scene, examined the injured man;

    3). вводные инфинитивные конструкции. То be successful, one must work hard. Если инфинитивная конструкция выполняет функцию подлежащего, то она запятой не отделяется — То become a doctor was his dream;
    4). все вводные слова, обороты, словосочетания и придаточные предложения:
    а) слова типа however, moreover, therefore, besides, consequently, so to speak, in short, of course, as a result, we suppose, I think, as for as she is concerned:

    Besides, he didn't receive any answer.

    Of course, there are many ways to do it.

    Someone, I suppose, should check the papers;

    б) вводные обороты, прерывающие логическую последовательность изложения — Не disliked, and I agree with him, his manner of presentation the problem;
    в) слово also, если оно стоит в начале предложения для усиления — Also, we noticed that the prices were going up ( в остальных случаях also запятой не отделяется, ср. We also noticed that the prices were going up);
    5). вступительные слова и выражения типа yes, indeed, really, surely, well —

    Yes, I would like to say a few words on the problem.

    Well, the next thing we knew he had fired a shot;

    6). описательные определительные придаточные, которые могут быть опущены без ущерба для смысла предложения, в отличие от ограничивающих определительных придаточных, которые опущены быть не могут (последние запятой не отделяются) —

    The girl who lives next door came to work to our office,

    cp. Mary Jones, who lives next door, came to see us.

    The book (that) you gave me to read was very useful to me,

    cp. Pygmalion, the play written by B. Shaw, has been staged by many theatres;

     7). обращения — Henry, fetch another chair, please. I am sorry, Mr. White, that I must interrupt you; 8). конструкции-приложения — Thomas, our manager, is ill. Приложения, тесно связанные с определяемым словом и образующие единое словосочетание, запятой не отделяются — My cousin Bob. Mary Queen of Scots. His friend Bill; 9). ряд однородных определений — She decided to have potatoes, beans, and ice cream. He walked off the stage, turned round, came back, and stared at the audience. He asked for paper, a pencil, and a ruler. They lived in a little, white house; 10). части сложносочиненных предложений, соединенных одним из сочинительных союзов and, but, for, or, nor, while (в значении but) — I dictated the letter, but she didn't put it down correctly. В тех случаях, когда сочинительного союза нет, части сложносочиненного предложения весьма распространенные и внутри имеют свои собственные знаки препинания, запятая между ними не употребляется; в этих случаях предпочтительнее точка с запятой или точка. Нераспространенные части сложносочиненных предложений, даже при наличии союза, запятой не отделяются — Не looked around but he didn't see anybody; 11). слова, выражающие противопоставления — I asked you to fill the document, not to destroy it. I'll let you do it this time, but never again. Children should be seen, but not heard; 12). прямая речь — He asked, "How long will it take you"; 13). вопросная часть разделительных вопросов — Не was right, wasn't he?; 14). обозначения даты и месяца отделяются запятой от обозначения места и года — April 8, 1872; Moscow, July 12, 1972; 15). звания, стоящие после имени собственного — Adams, Ph. D; 16). в четырехзначных и более числительных запятой отделяются числительные после тысячи — 1,767; 2,565,727; 17). номера страниц, два одинаковых слова или два или более чисел, выраженных цифровыми последовательностями и стоящих рядом — Lucy told you, you should stay here; Since 1988, 12,000 new machines have been sold. (4). Запятой не отделяются:
    а) слова в городских адресах, при обозначении страниц, года: page 15; in the year 1986; 115 Oxford Street;
    б) ограничивающие определительные и относительные придаточные, а также дополнительные придаточные — Не knows that you will be late. The book you gave me was very useful.
    (5). Точка с запятой используется главным образом в официальной письменной речи, в которой много очень длинных и синтаксически сложных предложений; в обыденной переписке не рекомендуется использовать точку с запятой слишком часто. (6). Двоеточие, как и в русском языке, употребляется перед перечислением, разъяснением и в приветствиях в деловой переписке. В обыденной, неофициальной переписке после обращения может использоваться запятая — Dear Mr. Brown; My dear Madam; cp. Dear Jane. Если после двоеточия следует полное предложение, то первое слово такого предложения пишется с заглавной буквы:

    These are your duties: Sort the mail, open all that is not personal, throw away the envelopes, and bring the letters to me.

    Если список перечисленных пунктов расположен в столбик, каждая новая строка должна начинаться с заглавной буквы, после каждого пункта знак препинания не ставится: You should know how to use the following office machines:
    1. Typewriter
    2. Calculator
    3. Copy Machine.
    (7). Двоеточие используется для отделения различных частей отсылок, заглавий, формул и числительных: The time was 9:15 p. m; We were given Chapter XII: Section 19 for our homework. (8). Кавычки в английском языке пишутся только сверху: “Where”, he asked, “are you going to keep it?” Только первое слово приводимой прямой речи пишется с заглавной буквы, вторая часть, если прямая речь прервана, пишется с маленькой буквы. (9). Кавычки не употребляются в косвенной речи: Не asked where we would keep it. (10). Заключенное в кавычки высказывание обычно заканчивается запятой или точкой перед закрывающимися кавычками: “They are not here,” he said.

    English-Russian word troubles > punctuation

  • 11 так

    I нареч.
    1) ( таким образом) like this, (in) this way, so

    сде́лайте так! — do it like this!

    де́ло обстои́т так — this is how matters stand

    так нельзя́ ничего́ доби́ться — you cannot achieve anything this way

    он отвеча́л так — he said this in reply; he answered as follows; this is the answer he gave

    и́менно так — exactly (so)

    я так и сказа́л ему́, что... — I told him in so many words that...

    он говори́л так, (как) бу́дто... — he spoke as though...

    он так говори́л, что... — he spoke in such a way that...

    так бы и сказа́ли! — why didn't you tell me before!

    так и случи́лось — so it happened

    2) (в том виде, как есть) as it is [was, etc]

    пусть так оста́нется — let it remain as it is

    так стра́шно — so terrible

    так необходи́мо — so necessary

    так ва́жно — so important

    бу́дьте так добры́ (+ повелит. накл.) — please (+ imper); (+ инф.) would you be so kind (as + to inf)

    не так (уж) (+ прил., нареч.) — not (really) so / that (+ adj, adv); (+ гл.) not that / so much (+ verb)

    дела́ не так (уж) пло́хи — things are not (really) so / that bad

    не так уж я э́того хочу́ — I don't want it that much / badly

    4) разг. (без явной цели, причины или последствий) for no reason; just like that

    э́то он так (то́лько) сказа́л — he didn't really mean it

    ты чего́ пришёл? - Да так — what have you come for? - I've just come [There's no special reason]

    подо́бная боле́знь так не прохо́дит — this kind of illness doesn't pass just like that [without consequences]

    как ты себя́ чу́вствуешь? - Да так — how do you feel? - Not too well [So-so; Fair to middling]

    и не друг и не враг, а так — neither a friend nor a foe, just someone

    6) разг. ( неважно) it's nothing; it doesn't matter; just

    ты почему́ пла́чешь? - Так, вспо́мнилось ко́е-что́ — why are you crying? - It's nothing, I just remembered something

    э́то мне так, друг оди́н позвони́л — it was just a friend calling

    7) разг. ирон. (в начале восклицательного предложения с глаголом в буд. вр. или прош. вр.; выражает невероятность чего-л) not likely!; (there's) no chance!

    так она́ тебя́ и послу́шает / послу́шала! — not likely she will listen to you!

    так я тебе́ и дам / дал свои́ де́ньги! — there's no chance I will give you my money!

    ••

    так бы и (+ сослагат. накл.)! разг. — wouldn't I just (+ inf)!

    так его́ [их]! разг. — let him [them] have it!

    так ему́ и на́до! разг. — (it) serves him right!; he asked for it!

    так же как (и) в знач. союза — 1) (в той же степени, что) just like 2) ( помимо) as well as

    так же как и вы, я ничего́ не зна́ю — (just) like you, I don't know anything

    опроси́ли свиде́телей, так же как и потерпе́вших — they questioned eyewitnesses as well as the victims

    так и быть — all right, very well; so be it

    так и есть — so it is; ( действительно) (and) indeed

    так и знай! — mind you!; that's for sure!; get this straight

    так и́ли ина́че — in any event / case; one way or another; ( в том и другом случае) in either event

    он так и не пришёл [сде́лал; сказа́л] — he never came [did it; said]

    я так и не узна́л э́того — I never found it out [learnt it]

    так и так (, де́скать / мол) разг. — here's what happened; here's what I have to say

    де́лай так, как я говорю́ — do as I say

    я хочу́ вы́глядеть так, как она́ — I want to look like her

    так, как э́то бы́ло — as it was; the way it was

    так как в знач. союза (поскольку, потому что) — because; as

    он не мо́жет переда́ть ей кни́гу, так как она́ уже́ уе́хала — he can't give her the book as / because she has already left

    так ли э́то? — is that (really) the case?, is that so?

    не так ли? — isn't that so?; переводится тж. разделительным вопросом

    мы встреча́лись с ва́ми ра́ньше, не так ли? — we have met before, haven't we?

    так ли, э́так / сяк ли — one way or another; somehow or other

    так называ́емый — so-called

    поменя́ться так на так — make an even swap

    так на так и получа́ется / выхо́дит — one (thing) makes up for the other

    так себе — so-so; could be better; middling; nothing special; nothing to write home about

    кни́жка э́та так себе — this book is not up to much

    так сказа́ть вводн. сл. — so to speak / say

    так тебя́ раста́к эвф. — you dirty so-and-so!

    так тому́ и бы́ть! — so be it!

    так то́чно! воен. — yes, sir!

    меня́ там не́ было, так что не спра́шивайте — I wasn't there, so don't ask me

    так, что́бы в знач. союза — so that

    сде́лайте так, что́бы никто́ не возража́л — do it so that nobody should object

    не так что́б(ы) разг. — not really; not so much

    так (я) и ду́мал — just as I thought

    так (я) и знал! — I knew it!; I knew it would happen!

    вот так! — that's the way!, that's right!

    е́сли так — if that's the case

    за так — for nothing; for free

    я и так э́то знал — I (always) knew that

    мне и так хорошо́ — I am fine the way I am

    они́ и так не бе́дные — they aren't poor anyway

    я и так спра́влюсь — I'll manage (anyway)

    и так да́лее (сокр. и т.д.) — etcetera [ɪt'setrə] (сокр. etc.); and so on / forth

    и так и сяк / э́так — this way and that; this way, that way and every way

    как (э́то) так? — how come?, how's that?

    как бы не так! — not likely!; nothing of the kind!

    не так что́бы о́чень — not that much

    про́сто так — 1) ( без особой причины) for no special reason 2) ( бесплатно) for free

    э́то бы́ло не про́сто так — there was a reason for / behind it

    они́ раздава́ли ве́щи про́сто так — they gave things away

    а хоть / хотя́ бы и так! разг. — so what (of it)!

    что́ так? — why?; ( после отрицания) why not?

    что́-то тут не так — there's something wrong here

    II вводн. сл. книжн.

    так, наприме́р — thus; for example

    III союз разг.

    зре́ние слабе́ет, так прихо́дится носи́ть очки́ — my eyesight is weakening, so I have to wear glasses

    2) (но, однако) but

    пое́хать бы к мо́рю, так де́нег нет — it wouldn't be bad to go to the seashore, but I have no money for it

    ему́ предлага́ли помо́чь, так нет же, не согласи́лся! — he was offered help, but no, he wouldn't accept it!

    IV частица разг.
    1) (в таком случае, тогда) then

    е́сли ты не пойдёшь, так я пойду́ — if you don't go, then I will

    не тут, так там — if (it is) not here, then (it is) there

    хоти́те так е́шьте — eat it if you want to

    так что же вы ра́ньше не сказа́ли! — (then) why didn't you tell me before!

    2) (значит, следовательно) so

    так он прие́хал! — so he has come!

    так вы его́ зна́ете! — so you know him!

    так во́т вы где! — so that's where you are!

    3) (в вопросе: выражает побуждение к ответу) well...?, so...?

    так ка́к, вы согла́сны? — so / well, do you agree?

    так что́, мы идём на ре́ку? — so / well, are we going to the river?

    так вы действи́тельно э́того хоти́те? — are you sure you really want it?

    так где же они́? — well, where are they?!

    4) (с повтором сущ. в им.: указывает на необычность, выдающиеся качества предмета) that's what I call a (noun); that's a (noun) to end all (noun pl)

    вот э́то ды́ня так ды́ня! — that's what I call a real melon!; that's a melon to end all melons!

    5) (с повтором гл.: указывает на серьёзность, размах или особое качество действия) seriously; really well; in the big way

    игра́ть так игра́ть, а не по телефо́ну разгова́ривать — (if we are going to play) let's play seriously, and no talking on the phone

    вот он пьёт так пьёт — he drinks really hard; he drinks in the big way

    гуля́ть так гуля́ть! — let's paint the town red!

    ну, ты ска́жешь так ска́жешь! — the things you are saying!

    6) (в позиции между подлежащим и сказуемым: вот, зато, между прочим) still, but; really; или не переводится

    а я так ду́маю, что он не прав — (but) I think he is wrong

    а им так всё равно́ — but it doesn't (really) matter to them; they don't (really) care

    7) (в позиции после слова, выделяемого инверсией) переводится эмфатическими оборотами и конструкциями

    экза́мены - так он о них не ду́мает — as for the exams, he doesn't think about them; exams is the last thing he cares about; it's not the exams he thinks about

    пое́сть так вы лю́бите, а пригото́вить вас не заста́вишь! — you do like to eat, don't you, but there's no way to make you cook!

    8) ( примерно) about, some

    лет так два́дцать наза́д — it was about / some twenty years ago

    9) (после нареч.; довольно-таки, весьма) rather; quite; kind of разг.

    она́ ничего́ так, хоро́шенькая — she's rather [kind of] pretty / cute

    мы непло́хо так посиде́ли — we had quite a good time (in a bar, etc)

    он вы́шел и недово́льно так говори́т — he came out and said in a kind of displeased manner

    Новый большой русско-английский словарь > так

  • 12 через не могу

    прост.
    all the same (of doing smth.); at all costs, at any cost (price)

    Любимов был человек положительный и знающий, не пустозвон и не прожектёр. Если он скажет "можно" - значит, действительно можно. А если скажет "не могу", пусть и приходится иногда приказать ему сделать "через не могу", но в таких случах обязательно нужно прислушаться к его возражениям и помочь, потому что Любимов слов на ветер не бросает. (В. Кетлинская, Дни нашей жизни) — Lyubimov was a sound, experienced man, neither a dreamer nor a windbag. If he said it could be done, then indeed it could be. And if he said 'I can't do it', though it might sometimes be necessary to order him to do it all the same, his arguments were nevertheless always worth hearing and his difficulties worth considering, because Lyubimov was not a man to make a fuss about nothing.

    Русско-английский фразеологический словарь > через не могу

См. также в других словарях:

  • India — /in dee euh/, n. 1. Hindi, Bharat. a republic in S Asia: a union comprising 25 states and 7 union territories; formerly a British colony; gained independence Aug. 15, 1947; became a republic within the Commonwealth of Nations Jan. 26, 1950.… …   Universalium

  • Apostasy in Christianity — Judas betrays Jesus with a kiss. Judas Iscariot, one of the Twelve Apostles, became an apostate.[1] Apostasy in Christianity refers to the rejection of Christianity by someone who formerly was a Christian. The term apostasy comes from the Greek… …   Wikipedia

  • Nicomachean Ethics — Part of a series on Aristotle …   Wikipedia

  • The Blessed Trinity —     The Blessed Trinity     † Catholic Encyclopedia ► The Blessed Trinity     This article is divided as follows:          I. Dogma of the Trinity;     II. Proof of the Doctrine from Scripture;     III. Proof of the Doctrine from Tradition;… …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • Aristotle the philosopher of nature — David Furley 1 THE TREATISES ON NATURE The subject matter of the present chapter is what Aristotle has to say about the natural world the subject that in classical Greek is most accurately rendered as ta physika. But of course this includes many… …   History of philosophy

  • Idealism (italian) and after — Italian idealism and after Gentile, Croce and others Giacomo Rinaldi INTRODUCTION The history of twentieth century Italian philosophy is strongly influenced both by the peculiar character of its evolution in the preceding century and by… …   History of philosophy

  • MISHPAT IVRI — This article is arranged according to the following outline: definition and terminology RELIGIOUS HALAKHAH AND LEGAL HALAKHAH common features law and morals de oraita and de rabbanan distinguishing between the two categories legal consequences of …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • Constitution of the Netherlands — Netherlands This article is part of the series: Politics and government of the Netherlands …   Wikipedia

  • law, philosophy of — Introduction       the formulation of concepts and theories to aid in understanding the nature of law, the sources of its authority, and its role in society. In English speaking countries the term “jurisprudence” is often used synonymously and is …   Universalium

  • Science and mathematics from the Renaissance to Descartes — George Molland Early in the nineteenth century John Playfair wrote for the Encyclopaedia Britannica a long article entitled ‘Dissertation; exhibiting a General View of the Progress of Mathematics and Physical Science, since the Revival of Letters …   History of philosophy

  • human rights — fundamental rights, esp. those believed to belong to an individual and in whose exercise a government may not interfere, as the rights to speak, associate, work, etc. [1785 95] * * * Rights that belong to an individual as a consequence of being… …   Universalium

Поделиться ссылкой на выделенное

Прямая ссылка:
… Нажмите правой клавишей мыши и выберите «Копировать ссылку»